![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations! |
07-12-2012, 04:14 PM
|
#1 |
|
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,954
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
Last night I saw World War two-in colours, last episode.
In this episode that was about the war in the pacific and the use of nuclear weapon against Japan-A thought came up-What if we had devoloped the nuclear weapon before World war 2 1. Would the war have started? 2 If yes, when in the war, would the weapon have been used ? 3 if yes on both point, wich side would use it first ? I didn't came longer that to number one. Would Germany have attacked Poland if they new that England had nuclear weapon? Or would the relay on the air defence if such an attack would occur? Markus |
|
|
07-12-2012, 04:25 PM
|
#2 |
|
Navy Seal
![]() Join Date: Mar 2000
Posts: 8,683
Downloads: 19
Uploads: 0
|
If the Second World War was a nuclear one, I don't know who would have dropped the first bomb. Somebody would have done it eventually, and so London would probably look like this today:
![]() And Tokyo: ![]() Moscow: ![]() Neal on his way to work: ![]() Me on my way to work: ![]() Glad it didn't turn out that way. |
|
|
07-12-2012, 11:02 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Born to Run Silent
Join Date: Jan 1997
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 13,295
Downloads: 220
Uploads: 156
|
Quote:
.
__________________
|
|
|
|
07-13-2012, 12:50 AM
|
#4 |
|
CIA Analyst
|
Both sides in Europe didn't use Chem/Bio weapons because of the threat of mutual retaliation.
Japan refused to use them on the US because of the same. (can't be said about them an China). I don't think they would have been eager to use them, and by the time they were desperate enough to try delivery would have been highly difficult if not impossible. (and I discount use of missiles as delivery systems because of the limited payload of the V2 at the time.) |
|
|
07-13-2012, 12:57 AM
|
#5 | |
|
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 73
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
I was laughing for a good five minutes at that.
__________________
"Magnificent desolation."-Buzz Aldrin |
|
|
|
07-13-2012, 01:48 AM
|
#6 |
|
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Kalamazoo, MI
Posts: 3,232
Downloads: 84
Uploads: 0
|
nobody wins WW3
__________________
![]() Member of the Subsim Zombie Army |
|
|
07-13-2012, 01:50 AM
|
#7 |
|
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Atlanta, GA
Posts: 73
Downloads: 7
Uploads: 0
|
If it's nuclear. If it were conventional, it might have victors.
__________________
"Magnificent desolation."-Buzz Aldrin |
|
|
07-13-2012, 02:16 AM
|
#8 |
|
Tory Hunter
|
Well lets put it like this just before things started to go bad for Adolf an he got pissed off maybe he would have pushed the button first before he topped himself
__________________
Never trust the Tories look what Thatcher and Major did in the 80s and 90s and look what dodgy Dave ConMan is doing now ![]()
|
|
|
07-13-2012, 07:00 AM
|
#9 |
|
SUBSIM Diehard
![]() |
|
|
|
07-13-2012, 08:24 AM
|
#10 |
|
Machinist's Mate
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: In a sub
Posts: 123
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
Depends who has nukes. Everyone or just a few nations?
__________________
"Herr Kaleun, we have ran aground!" |
|
|
07-13-2012, 09:25 AM
|
#11 |
|
CIA Analyst
|
Nukes are not some kind of silver bullet, there delivery methods are quite conventional. There was a reason we built 32,000 of the things (and its not that Russia was a big country). We did not expect a large number to make it to their targets.
We have had ABM systems since the 1960s. ASATs were deployed in the USAF a year after Sputnik. The "Star Wars" weapons of Reagan's era were very nearly a reality. The reason these were not developed was political. With the threat of a real nuclear war working countermeasures could quickly be deployed (not counting an "out of the blue" type of attack by the guy with a single bomb). If we are talking about a WWII with nuclear weapons than both sides would have some kind of countermeasures already. If one side has ballistic missiles, the other side would be developing ABMs. If one side has high altitude bombers than the other side would be developing interceptors or SAMs, boomers; hunter-killers and so on. |
|
|
07-13-2012, 09:56 AM
|
#12 |
|
Machinist's Mate
![]() Join Date: May 2012
Location: In a sub
Posts: 123
Downloads: 32
Uploads: 0
|
It depends what we are talking about nuke-wise. I am not sure about missile delivered nukes as WW2 era missiles would be unreliable in a nuke war. Nukes dropped from bombers would probably be the main form of delivery.
__________________
"Herr Kaleun, we have ran aground!" |
|
|
07-13-2012, 01:33 PM
|
#13 |
|
Sea Lord
![]() Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Denmark
Posts: 1,954
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
|
Just to clear things out-Both side have nuclear weapons and both side have developed rocket(V2)
Markus |
|
|
07-13-2012, 03:09 PM
|
#14 |
|
Ocean Warrior
![]() Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,928
Downloads: 149
Uploads: 0
|
|
|
|
07-13-2012, 03:19 PM
|
#15 |
|
Midshipman
|
__________________
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|