[REL] Natural Sinking Mechanics - Page 4

cdrsubron7 · 08-12-2007, 01:35 PM

Thanks for all your efforts, WernerSoper.

D/l working now.

CaptainCox · 08-12-2007, 01:51 PM

YAY! way to go

mgbmike · 08-12-2007, 02:02 PM

Many many thanks Werner. Now take a break, at least for a little while.

Digital_Trucker · 08-12-2007, 02:13 PM

Yeeeeeeeeeeehah! It's Christmas again! Muchos thanko!

reallydedpoet · 08-12-2007, 02:17 PM

Nice work WS

RDP

Canonicus · 08-12-2007, 02:25 PM

Downloaded correct file.... works just fine....
Now!.....we got the REAL deal!

Thanks WS...hope you get your t-shirt, real soon

tater · 08-12-2007, 02:47 PM

Very nicely done.

I did the sample mission, and had a very wide variety of sinking. The CA went down with 1 fish, the CV took a few. I let the BB sit for a day with 2 holes, she had a heavy list but went on---I bet in rougher seas she might have sunk, actually.

Werner, in your experiments, do you find that the crew quality matters? You'd think a higher AI skill might = better damage control, but I don't know if that is the case or not, I've never tested.

BTW, what exact changes were made to torpedo.sim? I'd like to incorporate them into the hardcore torpedo mod, it's just too easy without a 70% failure rate, lol

EDIT: I keep forgetting I have the coolest tool in the world now, S3D! Is the -3000 impulse the only change?

tater

WernerSobe · 08-12-2007, 02:49 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tater

Very nicely done.

I did the sample mission, and had a very wide variety of sinking. The CA went down with 1 fish, the CV took a few. I let the BB sit for a day with 2 holes, she had a heavy list but went on---I bet in rougher seas she might have sunk, actually.

Werner, in your experiments, do you find that the crew quality matters? You'd think a higher AI skill might = better damage control, but I don't know if that is the case or not, I've never tested.

BTW, what exact changes were made to torpedo.sim? I'd like to incorporate them into the hardcore torpedo mod, it's just too easy without a 70% failure rate, lol

tater

the reversed impulse is in that file. see detailed changelog.

tater · 08-12-2007, 02:51 PM

I realized a dumb question after I asked, lol.

BTW:

AVGWarhawk · 08-12-2007, 04:09 PM

Ok, I got the files. I have a choice of two to use. Classic and Light. What is the difference?

WernerSobe · 08-12-2007, 05:01 PM

35% faster sink rates in light version. Well read the readme :-).

Anyway the sinking rates are also increased in classic version if you compare it to 2.6

Florida Sailor · 08-12-2007, 05:27 PM

WOW!

Great piece of work.
Thank you!

AVGWarhawk · 08-12-2007, 07:03 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by WernerSobe

35% faster sink rates in light version. Well read the readme :-).

Anyway the sinking rates are also increased in classic version if you compare it to 2.6

I did not see that in the readme.

So is it 35% faster sinking than the classic version?

WernerSobe · 08-12-2007, 07:42 PM

yes. faster meaning they will flood faster but the damage system remains.

AVGWarhawk · 08-12-2007, 08:30 PM

Great! This is the one I selected. Let see how it goes and many thanks for working on this mod. Nice realistic addition.

08-12-2007, 01:35 PM	#46
cdrsubron7 Grey Wolf Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Carol Stream, IL Posts: 805 Downloads: 128 Uploads: 0	Thanks for all your efforts, WernerSoper. D/l working now. __________________ Head Deep and Keep'em Astern" - LtCDR Samuel D Dealy

08-12-2007, 01:51 PM	#47
CaptainCox Sea Lord Join Date: Feb 2007 Location: A Swede in Frankfurt am Main Posts: 1,897 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	YAY! way to go __________________ DOWNLOAD MY MODS HERE

08-12-2007, 02:02 PM	#48
mgbmike Torpedoman Join Date: Apr 2005 Location: Central Connecticut Posts: 113 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	Many many thanks Werner. Now take a break, at least for a little while. __________________ Dual core 2.8 Ghz HP Media Center running XP pro 2 Gb mem ATI X1650 w/512 Mb mem Realtek High Definition Audio

08-12-2007, 02:17 PM	#50
reallydedpoet Mariner Join Date: Jul 2006 Location: Canada Posts: 8,623 Downloads: 654 Uploads: 2	Nice work WS RDP __________________ Advanced Search Option - Google Search for SUBSIM Stan Rogers - Gordon Lightfoot - Stompin' Tom

08-12-2007, 04:09 PM	#55
AVGWarhawk Buick Driver Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In a 1954 Buick. Posts: 23,385 Downloads: 50 Uploads: 0	Ok, I got the files. I have a choice of two to use. Classic and Light. What is the difference? __________________ Be alert. The world needs more alerts.

08-12-2007, 02:13 PM	#49
Digital_Trucker Silent Hunter Join Date: Jul 2007 Location: The Peach State Posts: 4,150 Downloads: 19 Uploads: 7	Yeeeeeeeeeeehah! It's Christmas again! Muchos thanko!

08-12-2007, 02:25 PM	#51
Canonicus Weps Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: In your baffles... Posts: 374 Downloads: 194 Uploads: 0	Downloaded correct file.... works just fine.... Now!.....we got the REAL deal! Thanks WS...hope you get your t-shirt, real soon

08-12-2007, 02:47 PM	#52
tater Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Mexico, USA Posts: 9,050 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 2	Very nicely done. I did the sample mission, and had a very wide variety of sinking. The CA went down with 1 fish, the CV took a few. I let the BB sit for a day with 2 holes, she had a heavy list but went on---I bet in rougher seas she might have sunk, actually. Werner, in your experiments, do you find that the crew quality matters? You'd think a higher AI skill might = better damage control, but I don't know if that is the case or not, I've never tested. BTW, what exact changes were made to torpedo.sim? I'd like to incorporate them into the hardcore torpedo mod, it's just too easy without a 70% failure rate, lol EDIT: I keep forgetting I have the coolest tool in the world now, S3D! Is the -3000 impulse the only change? tater

08-12-2007, 02:51 PM	#54
tater Navy Seal Join Date: Mar 2007 Location: New Mexico, USA Posts: 9,050 Downloads: 8 Uploads: 2	I realized a dumb question after I asked, lol. BTW:

08-12-2007, 05:01 PM	#56
WernerSobe Commodore Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 625 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	35% faster sink rates in light version. Well read the readme :-). Anyway the sinking rates are also increased in classic version if you compare it to 2.6

08-12-2007, 05:27 PM	#57
Florida Sailor A-ganger Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Valrico, Florida Posts: 71 Downloads: 15 Uploads: 0	WOW! Great piece of work. Thank you!

08-12-2007, 07:42 PM	#59
WernerSobe Commodore Join Date: Jul 2006 Posts: 625 Downloads: 5 Uploads: 0	yes. faster meaning they will flood faster but the damage system remains.

08-12-2007, 08:30 PM	#60
AVGWarhawk Buick Driver Join Date: Jun 2005 Location: In a 1954 Buick. Posts: 23,385 Downloads: 50 Uploads: 0	Great! This is the one I selected. Let see how it goes and many thanks for working on this mod. Nice realistic addition. __________________ Be alert. The world needs more alerts.

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode