Which one is less easy to spot by enemy..observation scope or attack scope ?

Sardaukar67 · 06-25-2007, 02:19 PM

Playing NYGM (because it doesn't strain my Graphics Card like GWX) and I started to wonder which one of periscopes is harder to spot ? I don't know how much it matters, since I use attack scope for...well..attack... But would it be beneficial to use observation scope and switch to attack scope of just use attack scope when in vincinity of enemies ?

Packerton · 06-25-2007, 02:22 PM

I never ever used the Observation Periscope.

Attack just feels more efficient as its harder to spot and has no disadvantages that put it under the ob periscope.

Schöneboom · 06-25-2007, 02:33 PM

In gameplay terms, I doubt you'll see a difference between the two scopes -- but when & how you use them could make a significant difference. For ex., running fast with the scope up makes a bigger wake, which you don't want.

Mach's gut!

dean_acheson · 06-25-2007, 02:36 PM

Is this actually modeled (sp) into SH3 and 4?

IrischKapitan · 06-25-2007, 02:46 PM

In real life the Op. Scope was known as the ''sky scope'' it was useful for, well as the name suggests, aeroplanes. It was bigger than the Attack scope, and captians didnt like using it as it left a bigger wake and was easier to spot during the day.

In game, I find it easier to scan the horizon because of the 1X magnifacation and has a higher max angle then the attack scope, also it useful for a back-up scope if your attack one is damaged.

As for the difference of the visibility of the two scopes to the enemy, I dont think it makes too much difference.....

Tobus · 06-26-2007, 09:06 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Packerton

I never ever used the Observation Periscope.

Attack just feels more efficient as its harder to spot and has no disadvantages that put it under the ob periscope.

It has one very big (kinda cheaty) advantage: it was a skyscope. Before surfacing you can check for aircraft. But below you can use it to keep tabs on the destroyer looking for your blood and its DC's, because you can look straight up. On flank speed, depth of 100-130 and manual rudder you can evade DC's endlessly. Any deeper and you can't see the surface anymore, so DC's just appear out of the murk.

Heibges · 06-26-2007, 05:13 PM

I believe they often used both scopes at once for better 360° Security.

Sailor Steve · 06-26-2007, 07:16 PM

Another advantage of the Observation 'Scope is that it's in the control room. In a u-boat you have to climb to the conning tower, sit in the saddle and operate the mechanism to look around with the Attack 'Scope. The Obs 'Scope, you just walk to it and pull the 'up' lever.

06-25-2007, 02:19 PM	#1
Sardaukar67 Torpedoman Join Date: Mar 2007 Posts: 119 Downloads: 13 Uploads: 0	Which one is less easy to spot by enemy..observation scope or attack scope ? Playing NYGM (because it doesn't strain my Graphics Card like GWX) and I started to wonder which one of periscopes is harder to spot ? I don't know how much it matters, since I use attack scope for...well..attack... But would it be beneficial to use observation scope and switch to attack scope of just use attack scope when in vincinity of enemies ?

06-25-2007, 02:33 PM	#3
Schöneboom Commodore Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: San Francisco, CA Posts: 627 Downloads: 29 Uploads: 0	In gameplay terms, I doubt you'll see a difference between the two scopes -- but when & how you use them could make a significant difference. For ex., running fast with the scope up makes a bigger wake, which you don't want. Mach's gut! __________________ Dietrich Schöneboom, U-431 "Es wird klappen, Herr Kaleun. Ganz sicher."

06-25-2007, 02:36 PM	#4
dean_acheson Ace of the Deep Join Date: Mar 2001 Location: Midwest - USA Posts: 1,103 Downloads: 26 Uploads: 0	Is this actually modeled (sp) into SH3 and 4? __________________

06-26-2007, 05:13 PM	#7
Heibges Admiral Join Date: Feb 2004 Location: San Francisco, California Posts: 2,182 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	I believe they often used both scopes at once for better 360° Security. __________________ U.Kdt.Hdb B. I. 28) This possibility of using the hydrophone to help in detecting surface ships should, however, be restricted to those cases where the submarine is unavoidably compelled to stay below the surface. http://www.hackworth.com/

06-26-2007, 07:16 PM	#8
Sailor Steve Just A Kid At Heart Join Date: Nov 2002 Location: 600 miles from the nearest ocean. Posts: 44,843 Downloads: 406 Uploads: 227	Another advantage of the Observation 'Scope is that it's in the control room. In a u-boat you have to climb to the conning tower, sit in the saddle and operate the mechanism to look around with the Attack 'Scope. The Obs 'Scope, you just walk to it and pull the 'up' lever. __________________ "Human beings are perhaps never more frightening than when they are convinced beyond doubt that they are right." – Laurens van der Post

06-25-2007, 02:22 PM	#2
Packerton Sonar Guy Join Date: Apr 2007 Location: Newfoundland,Canada Posts: 398 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	I never ever used the Observation Periscope. Attack just feels more efficient as its harder to spot and has no disadvantages that put it under the ob periscope.

06-25-2007, 02:46 PM	#5
IrischKapitan Ensign Join Date: Jun 2007 Location: Waiting for convoys of the coast of Donegal Posts: 227 Downloads: 0 Uploads: 0	In real life the Op. Scope was known as the ''sky scope'' it was useful for, well as the name suggests, aeroplanes. It was bigger than the Attack scope, and captians didnt like using it as it left a bigger wake and was easier to spot during the day. In game, I find it easier to scan the horizon because of the 1X magnifacation and has a higher max angle then the attack scope, also it useful for a back-up scope if your attack one is damaged. As for the difference of the visibility of the two scopes to the enemy, I dont think it makes too much difference.....

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode