SUBSIM Radio Room Forums
Frau kaleun shops here, how about you?
Want to support Subsim and make Amazon pay for it? Click here to start any Amazon shopping.


SUBSIM: The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations!

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > SH4 Fleet Boat Mods Workshop
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 01-30-2007, 10:53 PM   #1
iambecomelife
Silent Hunter
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,648
Downloads: 109
Uploads: 0


Default Thoughts on torpedo failure

While reading one of the game previews I noticed commentary on the problem with American torpedoes' firing pins - the developers confirmed that, just like in real life, torpedos that strike a glancing blow will be more likely to explode than those that hit perpendicular to the target. In my opinion the average player will have something of an ahistorical advantage since unlike the typical commander of the era we already know how to get around this problem (in part). What would you think of a mod that makes all torpedo angles equally likely to fail early in the war? Perhaps by late 1942-early 1943 we could re-implement the default detonation probability, in order to represent word getting around about how to aim your torps. I bet this is not going to be popular with everyone - just a thought...:hmm:
__________________

"Every crossword puzzle from every magazine I could find was done before 12:00 Noon. I waited & waited for the phone call with
anticipation that would challenge the feeling of a little boy
waiting to get off the schoolbus on the last day."
iambecomelife is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 10:56 PM   #2
codmander
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Mar 2001
Location: cape cod mass.
Posts: 1,221
Downloads: 49
Uploads: 0


Default

usa torps had some massive problems which probly cost a few sub mariners their skin
codmander is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-30-2007, 11:48 PM   #3
bookworm_020
Navy Seal
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Sinking ships off the Australian coast
Posts: 5,978
Downloads: 1
Uploads: 0
Default

It also saved many japanese ships from being sunk in the first two years of the war. There were reports of mechants being drydock and haveing two or three un exploded torpedos sticking out of there hulls!

I'm suprised that the crews didn't mutiny!
bookworm_020 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 12:49 AM   #4
Finback
Electrician's Mate
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 138
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

I think that mod idea is great! Most likely will regret that I admitted it though :hmm: .

Hopefully, the Mark X torpedos will be less prone to duds than the XIV's. Another good reason to have the old S Class boats in the game.
Finback is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 01:00 AM   #5
sober
Ace of the deep .
 
sober's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Australia
Posts: 7,124
Downloads: 620
Uploads: 36


Default

I want realism damn it . If i choose to start my career early and get my arse kicked for not sinking anything because of torp failure then so be it . If you dont like torp failures then untick the box that will say (tick for realistic torp failures) like SH3 .

realistic
sober is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 01:52 AM   #6
StandingCow
Watch Officer
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Posts: 344
Downloads: 11
Uploads: 0
Default

How were US torps vs Uboat torps for their time? More or less duds?
__________________
StandingCow is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 04:24 AM   #7
fire-fox
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Peoples Republic of West Yorkshire
Posts: 597
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by StandingCow
How were US torps vs Uboat torps for their time? More or less duds?
well for a start the the US trigers in the MK XIV was going to be saw good that it was never tested, and still dever got propper test till about mid-1943!!!! but it had more buges that a bad install of Window 95. with the whourst (in my opinone) being that a impact of @ 10` +/- whould corse the fireing pin to be crushed before it could set of the warhead. saw all the effort that was used by the crew to get that perfect 0` AOB shot never payed off.

PS sorry for the crap spelling
__________________
How to make a M$ Vista simulator.

Just turn on all the flashy crap in XP, changed the background image, take some memory out of the box and clocked down the CPU. Then brake Media player. Works like a charm.
fire-fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:07 AM   #8
Barkhorn1x
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Davie, FL Grid DM 23
Posts: 568
Downloads: 24
Uploads: 0
Default

Articles on line giving you all the detail you could want:

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp1.htm

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp2.htm

Barkhorn.
Barkhorn1x is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 08:50 AM   #9
fire-fox
Samurai Navy
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Peoples Republic of West Yorkshire
Posts: 597
Downloads: 16
Uploads: 0
Default

a secound major folt (dont think thay'll put this in SH4) was where there would be a water splash as the torpedo hit the target and may be the detonator worked but did not triger the main charge, resulting in miner hull damage and the belife (from inexpereasd crews) that the torpedo worked but it didnt.
__________________
How to make a M$ Vista simulator.

Just turn on all the flashy crap in XP, changed the background image, take some memory out of the box and clocked down the CPU. Then brake Media player. Works like a charm.
fire-fox is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-31-2007, 10:15 AM   #10
Sailor Steve
Just A Kid At Heart
 
Sailor Steve's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2002
Location: 600 miles from the nearest ocean.
Posts: 44,838
Downloads: 406
Uploads: 227


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by bookworm_020
It also saved many japanese ships from being sunk in the first two years of the war. There were reports of mechants being drydock and haveing two or three un exploded torpedos sticking out of there hulls!

I'm suprised that the crews didn't mutiny!
That strikes me as odd, simply because I was reading the Japanese merchant records and came across one instance of a dud torpedo that made a big enough hole that the ship sank anyway.
__________________
"Human beings are perhaps never more frightening than when they are convinced beyond doubt that they are right."
– Laurens van der Post

Sailor Steve is online   Reply With Quote
Old 02-01-2007, 12:39 PM   #11
NEON DEON
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,214
Downloads: 37
Uploads: 5
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Barkhorn1x
Articles on line giving you all the detail you could want:

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp1.htm

http://www.geocities.com/Pentagon/1592/ustorp2.htm

Barkhorn.
Thanks Barkhorn. That was a great read.
NEON DEON is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 03:21 AM   #12
Crosseye76
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 258
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

A great read. It even mentions that the same series of problems also dogged the Germans early in the war.
__________________
There are only two kinds of ships. Submarines and Targets.
Crosseye76 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-10-2007, 09:57 AM   #13
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 82,507
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 8


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sober
I want realism damn it . If i choose to start my career early and get my arse kicked for not sinking anything because of torp failure then so be it . If you dont like torp failures then untick the box that will say (tick for realistic torp failures) like SH3 .

realistic
AMEN!!
__________________
Stop following me...I'm lost!!

GWX3.0 Download Page http://www.mediafire.com/myfiles.php?r=nkjkl#j35rkcr24g8d2
GWX Website/Home Page
Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) http://www.subsim.com/subsim_files/gwx_donation1207.php
Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2007, 09:44 PM   #14
marky
Medic
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 166
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by sober
I want realism damn it . If i choose to start my career early and get my arse kicked for not sinking anything because of torp failure then so be it . If you dont like torp failures then untick the box that will say (tick for realistic torp failures) like SH3 .

realistic
AGRREEED!!!

live with it!

offset the MK14 failures by-

1. fire spreads of 2 or 3 fish
2. set at 1 foot depth to avoid depth malfunction
3. use contact fuse only
4. use ur gun duhh
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by marky
can u imagine a real boat skipper coming back to Pearl and talking to Lockwood or Nimitz and saying...
o ur retiring me? im sorry i didnt mean to sink so many ships..........:rotfl:
Ex-SH4 player
when they fix it and make it playable, then ill play it again
marky is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 03-11-2007, 09:47 PM   #15
marky
Medic
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 166
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
Default

guys if u dot want torp failures then dont play the game, its war, it appens, get ovedr it

dont freakin cheat

its almost as if ur dishonoring the guys who served in subs just by saying u want a mod to get around it

my god...
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by marky
can u imagine a real boat skipper coming back to Pearl and talking to Lockwood or Nimitz and saying...
o ur retiring me? im sorry i didnt mean to sink so many ships..........:rotfl:
Ex-SH4 player
when they fix it and make it playable, then ill play it again
marky is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:47 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1997- 2013 Subsim