SUBSIM Radio Room Forums
Frau kaleun shops here, how about you?
Want to support Subsim and make Amazon pay for it? Click here to start any Amazon shopping.


SUBSIM: The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations!

Go Back   SUBSIM Radio Room Forums > Silent Hunter 3 - 4 - 5 > Silent Hunter III
Forget password? Reset here

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 05-22-2012, 04:37 PM   #1
rudewarrior
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 269
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 2
Default T2 vs. T3

Just a question about the actual torpedoes.

I understand the history of development of the two torpedoes.

What I am trying to find out is if a T3 is just a retrofitted T2, i.e. a T2 with a new depth-keeping device and some other minor changes to accomodate, or is it completely revamped, i.e. a new torpedo altogether.

All the data seems to point to them having the same range and capability, so I am curious if it was a retrofit or redone.

If a retrofit, maybe it should have been called a T2.1?

I kill myself sometimes.
rudewarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 09:19 PM   #2
Kptlt. Siegmann
Electrician's Mate
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Docked at Kiel
Posts: 132
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
Default

The T3 was basically a T2 with overhauled detonators. There was a variant of the T3 that increased the maximum range to 7500m (up from 5000m), but to my knowledge, the top speed was always 30kts.
__________________
Lt. Paul Siegmann | U-9 Type IIA | 0 ships - 0t sunk
1st Flotilla | August 26th, 1939 | GWX3 w/MaGUI F 100% DiD
[N/A]
Last Reported In: 30-MAY-2012 @ 16:20 UTC
Kptlt. Siegmann is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-22-2012, 11:52 PM   #3
rudewarrior
Lieutenant
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 269
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 2
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Kptlt. Siegmann View Post
The T3 was basically a T2 with overhauled detonators. There was a variant of the T3 that increased the maximum range to 7500m (up from 5000m), but to my knowledge, the top speed was always 30kts.
I thought so. It seemed from everything I read it was really a retrofit. The biggest giveaway to me was just how easily it went into production after the new depth-keeping modification. Just seemed like they fixed that aspect and then it pretty much came right online.

Thanx for the confirmation.
rudewarrior is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 06:26 AM   #4
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 82,707
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 8


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by rudewarrior View Post
Just a question about the actual torpedoes.

I understand the history of development of the two torpedoes.

What I am trying to find out is if a T3 is just a retrofitted T2, i.e. a T2 with a new depth-keeping device and some other minor changes to accomodate, or is it completely revamped, i.e. a new torpedo altogether.

All the data seems to point to them having the same range and capability, so I am curious if it was a retrofit or redone.

If a retrofit, maybe it should have been called a T2.1?

I kill myself sometimes.
http://www.uboat.net/technical/torpedoes.htm

http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WTGER_WWII.htm
__________________
Stop following me...I'm lost!!

GWX3.0 Download Page http://www.mediafire.com/myfiles.php?r=nkjkl#j35rkcr24g8d2
GWX Website/Home Page
Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) http://www.subsim.com/subsim_files/gwx_donation1207.php
Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 06:44 AM   #5
Captain Nemo
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,292
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
Default

Thanks for posting the links. Looking at the T1 those range numbers look different to those used in SH3/GWX. Regarding the T5 is it modelled in SH3/GWX that the torpedo could home in on the u-boat that fired it? Even though I've played for many years I've never got that far in a career to use a T5 hence the reason for my question!

Nemo
__________________
"I'm afraid there is no disguising the fact that King's obsession with the Pacific and the Battle of Washington cost us dear in the Battle of the Atlantic".

Sir John Slessor GCB, DSO, MC, DL
AOC-in-C Coastal Command RAF
___________________________________________
Captain Nemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 07:11 AM   #6
Jimbuna
Chief of the Boat
 
Jimbuna's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: 250 metres below the surface
Posts: 82,707
Downloads: 42
Uploads: 8


Default

I've not got access to the mod files on this system atm so I honestly can't answer....perhaps a read of the manual or some other kind soul can answer but I'm at work now until tomorrow afternoon.
__________________
Stop following me...I'm lost!!

GWX3.0 Download Page http://www.mediafire.com/myfiles.php?r=nkjkl#j35rkcr24g8d2
GWX Website/Home Page
Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) http://www.subsim.com/subsim_files/gwx_donation1207.php
Jimbuna is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-23-2012, 07:54 AM   #7
Captain Nemo
Ace of the Deep
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,292
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
Default

I am at work too, but I have access to v1 of the GWX manual. I did a quick scan but couldn't spot any technical data relating to torpedoes.

Nemo
__________________
"I'm afraid there is no disguising the fact that King's obsession with the Pacific and the Battle of Washington cost us dear in the Battle of the Atlantic".

Sir John Slessor GCB, DSO, MC, DL
AOC-in-C Coastal Command RAF
___________________________________________
Captain Nemo is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 03:27 PM   #8
Olamagato
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 71
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Torpedoes settings in GWX are quite inconsistent. GWX merged T3 torpedo properties (1943) with torpedo T2 (1942), when its properties almost did not differ from T3. Should be used for parameters T2 from 1939 or 1940 when the torpedo was not pre-heated nor had improved batteries. Therefore, such parameters that were in the SH3 were more consistent with history - 3km@28kts.
This is not the only GWX problem with the torpedo parameters.
- T3 FAT II from 1943 have 7,3km@30kts range but newer model T3 LUT II from 1944 with small simpler homing mechanism and improved batteries have merely 5km@30kts in GWX. And we know that homing torpedoes had slightly larger range because of the use of improved batteries, which are also used in the model T3 later war (Maximum range of later war T3 with improved batteries was ~7,5km).
- The strength of acoustic torpedo head is the same as torpedoes T2 and T3, although T4 and T5 torpedoes contained 200 kg of hexanit instead of 300 kg.

Once I made myself small package of restoring the historical parameters of torpedoes:
1939.01 T1: no change (12,5km@30kts, 7,5km@40kts, 5km@44kts)
1942.10 T1 FaT: no change (as above)
1944.03 T1 LuT : no change (as above)
1939.01 T2: 3km@28kts, standard detonation
1942.06 T3: no change (5 km@30 kts, standard detonation)
1943.03 T3 FaT2: 6,4km@30kts, standard detonation
1944.09 T3 LuT2: 7,3km@30 kts, standard detonation
1943.07 T4: range and speed no change, 2/3 detonation strength
1943.10 T5: range and speed no change, 2/3 detonation strength
download:
http://www.mediafire.com/?rnb5b96usocjtfi
Olamagato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 03:48 PM   #9
Olamagato
A-ganger
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 71
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Captain Nemo View Post
Looking at the T1 those range numbers look different to those used in SH3/GWX.
They come from the actual German data, not from the testimony of prisoners. British and U.S. data include a maximum range of torpedoes, and not the effective range at which the torpedo moving with constant speed. Only a constant speed allowed to hit in accordance with the calculations. While the maximum range of variable speed was significant at the attacks on the convoys with FAT and LUT torpedoes.
That is why the game should set the maximum ranges with variable speed for torpedoes FAT/LUT (14/8/6km for T1FAT/LUT, 6/7km for T3FAT/LUT), and maximum effective ranges at a constant speed for the remaining torpedoes (12,5/7,5/5km for T1, 3/5km for T2/T3).
Olamagato is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 05-24-2012, 07:17 PM   #10
Missing Name
Seasoned Skipper
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 721
Downloads: 84
Uploads: 0
Default

I always wondered why the Wren-II homing torpedo was modeled in the game instead of the T3a. The ZII was never used in combat as far as I can tell... but the T3a was used from early 1944 on.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: British merchant cruiser, 14000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive.



Read Brag's Kingmaker. Just read it.

Last edited by Missing Name; 05-24-2012 at 07:28 PM.
Missing Name is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:45 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1997- 2013 Subsim