![]() |
SUBSIM: The Web's #1 BBS for all submarine and naval simulations! |
05-22-2012, 04:37 PM
|
#1 |
|
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 269
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 2
|
Just a question about the actual torpedoes.
I understand the history of development of the two torpedoes. What I am trying to find out is if a T3 is just a retrofitted T2, i.e. a T2 with a new depth-keeping device and some other minor changes to accomodate, or is it completely revamped, i.e. a new torpedo altogether. All the data seems to point to them having the same range and capability, so I am curious if it was a retrofit or redone. If a retrofit, maybe it should have been called a T2.1? ![]() I kill myself sometimes.
|
|
|
05-22-2012, 09:19 PM
|
#2 |
|
Electrician's Mate
![]() Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Docked at Kiel
Posts: 132
Downloads: 22
Uploads: 0
|
The T3 was basically a T2 with overhauled detonators. There was a variant of the T3 that increased the maximum range to 7500m (up from 5000m), but to my knowledge, the top speed was always 30kts.
__________________
Lt. Paul Siegmann | U-9 Type IIA | 0 ships - 0t sunk 1st Flotilla | August 26th, 1939 | GWX3 w/MaGUI F 100% DiD [N/A] Last Reported In: 30-MAY-2012 @ 16:20 UTC |
|
|
05-22-2012, 11:52 PM
|
#3 | |
|
Lieutenant
![]() Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Austin, TX, USA
Posts: 269
Downloads: 108
Uploads: 2
|
Quote:
Thanx for the confirmation.
|
|
|
|
05-23-2012, 06:26 AM
|
#4 | |
|
Chief of the Boat
|
Quote:
http://www.navweaps.com/Weapons/WTGER_WWII.htm
__________________
Stop following me...I'm lost!! GWX3.0 Download Page http://www.mediafire.com/myfiles.php?r=nkjkl#j35rkcr24g8d2 GWX Website/Home Page Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) http://www.subsim.com/subsim_files/gwx_donation1207.php
|
|
|
|
05-23-2012, 06:44 AM
|
#5 | |
|
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,292
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
Nemo
__________________
"I'm afraid there is no disguising the fact that King's obsession with the Pacific and the Battle of Washington cost us dear in the Battle of the Atlantic". Sir John Slessor GCB, DSO, MC, DL AOC-in-C Coastal Command RAF ___________________________________________ |
|
|
|
05-23-2012, 07:11 AM
|
#6 |
|
Chief of the Boat
|
I've not got access to the mod files on this system atm so I honestly can't answer....perhaps a read of the manual or some other kind soul can answer but I'm at work now until tomorrow afternoon.
__________________
Stop following me...I'm lost!! GWX3.0 Download Page http://www.mediafire.com/myfiles.php?r=nkjkl#j35rkcr24g8d2 GWX Website/Home Page Donation/instant access to GWX (Help SubSim) http://www.subsim.com/subsim_files/gwx_donation1207.php
|
|
|
05-23-2012, 07:54 AM
|
#7 |
|
Ace of the Deep
![]() Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: London, England
Posts: 1,292
Downloads: 46
Uploads: 0
|
I am at work too, but I have access to v1 of the GWX manual. I did a quick scan but couldn't spot any technical data relating to torpedoes.
Nemo
__________________
"I'm afraid there is no disguising the fact that King's obsession with the Pacific and the Battle of Washington cost us dear in the Battle of the Atlantic". Sir John Slessor GCB, DSO, MC, DL AOC-in-C Coastal Command RAF ___________________________________________ |
|
|
05-24-2012, 03:27 PM
|
#8 |
|
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 71
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
Torpedoes settings in GWX are quite inconsistent. GWX merged T3 torpedo properties (1943) with torpedo T2 (1942), when its properties almost did not differ from T3. Should be used for parameters T2 from 1939 or 1940 when the torpedo was not pre-heated nor had improved batteries. Therefore, such parameters that were in the SH3 were more consistent with history - 3km@28kts.
This is not the only GWX problem with the torpedo parameters. - T3 FAT II from 1943 have 7,3km@30kts range but newer model T3 LUT II from 1944 with small simpler homing mechanism and improved batteries have merely 5km@30kts in GWX. And we know that homing torpedoes had slightly larger range because of the use of improved batteries, which are also used in the model T3 later war (Maximum range of later war T3 with improved batteries was ~7,5km). - The strength of acoustic torpedo head is the same as torpedoes T2 and T3, although T4 and T5 torpedoes contained 200 kg of hexanit instead of 300 kg. Once I made myself small package of restoring the historical parameters of torpedoes: 1939.01 T1: no change (12,5km@30kts, 7,5km@40kts, 5km@44kts) 1942.10 T1 FaT: no change (as above) 1944.03 T1 LuT : no change (as above) 1939.01 T2: 3km@28kts, standard detonation 1942.06 T3: no change (5 km@30 kts, standard detonation) 1943.03 T3 FaT2: 6,4km@30kts, standard detonation 1944.09 T3 LuT2: 7,3km@30 kts, standard detonation 1943.07 T4: range and speed no change, 2/3 detonation strength 1943.10 T5: range and speed no change, 2/3 detonation strength download: http://www.mediafire.com/?rnb5b96usocjtfi |
|
|
05-24-2012, 03:48 PM
|
#9 | |
|
A-ganger
![]() Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Earth
Posts: 71
Downloads: 29
Uploads: 0
|
Quote:
That is why the game should set the maximum ranges with variable speed for torpedoes FAT/LUT (14/8/6km for T1FAT/LUT, 6/7km for T3FAT/LUT), and maximum effective ranges at a constant speed for the remaining torpedoes (12,5/7,5/5km for T1, 3/5km for T2/T3). |
|
|
|
05-24-2012, 07:17 PM
|
#10 |
|
Seasoned Skipper
![]() Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Westun New Yahk
Posts: 721
Downloads: 84
Uploads: 0
|
I always wondered why the Wren-II homing torpedo was modeled in the game instead of the T3a. The ZII was never used in combat as far as I can tell... but the T3a was used from early 1944 on.
__________________
Largest target sunk with deck gun: British merchant cruiser, 14000 tons
Largest engaged: HMS Nelson. Results inconclusive. ![]() Read Brag's Kingmaker. Just read it. ![]() Last edited by Missing Name; 05-24-2012 at 07:28 PM. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|