SUBSIM: The Web's #1 resource for all submarine & naval simulations since 1997 |
09-21-15, 06:50 AM | #1 | |
Born to Run Silent
|
Will the U.S. Navy Torpedo Its Most Lethal Warship?
Will the U.S. Navy Torpedo Its Most Lethal Warship?
http://www.fool.com/investing/genera...l-warship.aspx Quote:
|
|
09-21-15, 10:57 AM | #2 | |
Gefallen Engel U-666
|
Economy of force$ a$ide:
It's actually an old lesson-well learned: "numbers have a cachet of their own" EXAMPLE:The Germans wasted money on tiger tanks when the panzer IV cost 1/4 as much and numbers would have served them better on all fronts. The Panther V 's time development delay cost the tide turning battle of Kursk! The king-tiger was a complete waste at the Bulge! What the navy has on agenda and better uses for:
Quote:
__________________
"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe" |
|
09-21-15, 12:12 PM | #3 |
Electrician's Mate
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Alberta, Canada
Posts: 132
Downloads: 35
Uploads: 0
|
Yeah the us and russia are suffering the same problem in the navy right now, the majority of their fleets are ageing ships built in the boom of the Cold War. The nimitz carriers are getting up there in age, as are the ohio class, the Ticos and all the perry class frigates are retired. The only arms of the navy that are fairly modern are the landing ships, destroyers and attack subs, but the 688s don't have much longer either and make up a large part of the sub fleet.
Long story short the carrier, cruiser, SSBN and frigate fleets need to be updated or replaced, and the downside is that all except the FFGs are large expensive ships. Meanwhile they have lots of Arleigh Burke DDGs, so it's understandable that they would scrub the destroyer project if money was tight
__________________
Americans make better submarines? No my friend, Russia makes better submarines, Americans just make better computers |
09-22-15, 09:47 PM | #4 |
Ocean Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,265
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
Our fleet is so new I don't think there's a single ship still serving, besides "Old Ironsides", that was in the fleet when I got out in 1992? I can't believe how much they must have spent to replace the entire fleet in just 23 years.
__________________
Looks like we need a Lemon Law for Presidents now! DNC sold us a dud, and they knew it. |
09-22-15, 09:58 PM | #5 |
Navy Seal
|
On the other hand, considering all the problems, cost overruns and rather dubious qualities of the DDG-1000, I'm not sure "most lethal ship" is entirely accurate. It's pretty flawed; its reputed stealth qualities have by now been negated by developments in radar, its originally-proposed land bombardment capability has been basically removed, and many have suggested that buying more Burkes is a far wiser investment anyway - and that, on the whole, the DDG-1000 is a far less effective ship in almost every role than the Burke while costing exponentially more.
|
09-22-15, 10:53 PM | #6 | |
Gefallen Engel U-666
|
Quote:
__________________
"Only two things are infinite; The Universe and human squirrelyness; and I'm not too sure about the Universe" |
|
09-23-15, 08:45 PM | #7 |
Ocean Warrior
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,265
Downloads: 0
Uploads: 0
|
I'm pretty sure they'll spend the entire $4 million, and then some.
__________________
Looks like we need a Lemon Law for Presidents now! DNC sold us a dud, and they knew it. |
|
|