View Single Post
Old 09-14-10, 04:17 PM   #123
makman94
Hellas
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 2,325
Downloads: 182
Uploads: 7


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by h.sie View Post
I'll contact Neal. Indeed an absurd situation.

In the meantime I could locate the routines which are responsible for the "nearest visual contact" output. Now they have to be optimised. Currently thinking about how to program that in an easy-to-do and realistic-looking way. Any suggestions? Should I only make the range more inaccurate or also the bearing ?

h.sie

oh ,oh...H.Sie , if you manage to control the WO will be just...wonderfull !!

i will,also, suggest to contact(exept Neal) Elanaiba in order to give you some tips on where exactly are 'hiding' the parts for the WO . if he helps a little, you will save a lot of time of just...searching .you never know....give him a pm

about the range accuracy ...i would suggest a 500 m difference would be ok.
and about bearing accuracy i would say that is ok to be left as it is becuase ,i suppose , they had the uzo back then to get the accurate bearings
__________________
Knowledge is the only thing that nobody can ever take from you...



Mediafire page:http://www.mediafire.com/folder/da50.../Makman94_Mods
makman94 is offline   Reply With Quote