SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Kapitan · 04-17-17, 07:18 AM

I understand the cost implications but having just 6 per fleet would be some what of a thin line.

I am assuming of course the yasen will likely replace the older Victor Sierra and Akula's which numbers run a lot more than 12 from knowledge a total of 16 971's were built along with 4 645's

And with a carrier programme looking to come along in the medium future a CVBG would require a few more nuclear submarine assets

04-17-17, 07:18 AM	#7
Kapitan Sub Test Pilot Join Date: Mar 2005 Location: UK + Canada Posts: 7,090 Downloads: 68 Uploads: 7	I understand the cost implications but having just 6 per fleet would be some what of a thin line. I am assuming of course the yasen will likely replace the older Victor Sierra and Akula's which numbers run a lot more than 12 from knowledge a total of 16 971's were built along with 4 645's And with a carrier programme looking to come along in the medium future a CVBG would require a few more nuclear submarine assets __________________ DONT FORGET if you like a post to nominate it by using the blue diamond Find out about Museum Ships here: https://www.museumships.us/ Flickr for all my pictures: https://www.flickr.com/photos/131313936@N03/ Navy general board articles: https://www.navygeneralboard.com/author/aegis/