View Single Post
Old 10-14-17, 05:12 AM   #2
derstosstrupp
Grey Wolf
 
derstosstrupp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 887
Downloads: 489
Uploads: 0


Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by hauangua View Post
I'd like to know

Historically in reality uboat commanders when the hydrophone had a contact what method used to intercept the target?
Did they really use 3 or 4 Bering method? Or? what method did they use?

Thanks
From my understanding, the hydrophone technology in WWII didn't provide pinpoint accurate bearings. From reading the U-boat commander's handbook, the hydrophone is described really as an auxiliary tool for general awareness of your surroundings and not for targeting specifically (although it could provide hints about enemy speed through turn counts). Generally, it seems that doctrine called for getting to the surface as soon as possible because there the boat is the most maneuverable and can take advantage of the situation. The 3- and 4-bearing methods certainly work, and can be practical if you can figure out how to do them while moving, because sitting still and waiting the time periods necessary, especially submerged, just wasn't done. The German theory was to get into a position as quickly as possible to where the attack could be carried out, and then move to the target to launch the attack in the least amount of time.
__________________
Ask me anything about the Type VII or IX!

One-Stop Targeting Shop:
https://drive.google.com/drive/folde...WwBt-1vjW28JbO
My YT Channel:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCIJ...9FXbD3S2kgwdPQ
derstosstrupp is offline   Reply With Quote