Quote:
Originally Posted by Nippelspanner
Just found this.
Just notice the comments and down-votes.
Looks like the RT-staff is doing double shifts...
|
very well done video, I was impressed until 6:32 when it turned out one of their key piece of evidence of the location of the BUK was a photo which has been pretty much discredited as being a fake:
https://7mei.nl/2015/05/18/mh17-buk-...os-are-cheats/
The problem with the investigation is that it has been political from the beginning.
There are two suspects, Russia and Ukraine.
Ukraine is part of the investigation, it has supplied the tapes, photos and witnesses. Why is a suspect part of the investigation? Is it not reasonable to assume Ukraine will conceal any evidence which could implicate it?
Russia and Ukraine both have BUKs. There was one held by the separatists, but Ukraine has 72. Where were they that day? no one knows, Ukraine has never said. Would it not be important to know where the UKR BUKs were located just to make sure it was not the UKR that fired the SAM?
Immediately after the shootdown, Kerry stated the U.S. had satellite images proving the SAM came from a Russian BUK. These images have never been released and as far as I can tell, the investigation team has not seen them either. Why? Do they even exist?