[Skybird]

Anyway, just to remind of what this thread originally was about in the main:

At the university one should learn to think. A decision of the student parliament of Humboldt University shows that one can also unlearn thinking there, says Gunnar Schupelius. The student parliament of the Humboldt University has set a new rule. It is called "hard quoting" and means that every debate ends when only men speak up, but no women.
This rule should ensure gender equality, meaning that men in a meeting do not talk more than women.
The quotation of the list of speakers is an old invention of the Greens, which has prevailed in many areas. What is new is the idea of ​​prohibiting men from speaking out when no woman wants to speak anymore.
Is such a prohibition even allowed? Responsible is the Senate Department for Science, which is led by the Governing Mayor Michael Müller (SPD). They wanted the decision of the student parliament "subject to legal review," said the administration in early June to FDP MP Marcel Luthe, who had asked.
In mid-July, it was then said that the Senate was expecting the President of Humboldt University to declare the decision ineffective. That has not happened yet.
The decision should indeed be invalidated, because it is absurd that men should stop talking if no woman answers.
The decision is further absurd in that it exposes the speakers to which gender they want to be. This is worded as follows: "A female identifying person" should be drawn on the list of speakers in front of the first "male identifying person", unless there is already a "identifying female" person. If there are only three "male identifiers" left on the speech list, the debate will end (...).
The confusion is programmed. If "a female identifying person" is not a woman but a man, she is still considered a woman and is allowed to speak, even though she is not supposed to speak because she is a man.
Universities are there to help you learn to think. You go to university, study there for a few years and come back educated. That is how it is thought. The namesake of the University of Unter den Linden, Wilhelm von Humboldt (1767-1835), spoke of the general education as the highest good.
How can this educational mission be linked to the crazy decision of the student parliament? Not at all! He is an expression of ignorance and delusion. He follows radical ideologies.
Firstly, the feminist demands that are pushed to extremes, and secondly, the so-called "gender theory", according to which every human being is to decide for himself whether he is a man or a woman and according to which there are not only two but many sexes.
At the university one should learn to think. Obviously, you also forget it there.

Source linked in post #1.