I'm missing something here. Who in their right mind would say no to a patch that would make a product, Ubi messed up, better? Why would Ubi even bother to wonder about such an obvious answer? Then again it makes sense when you consider the condition of SH4 that Ubi shoved out of the nest early.
Even though I have yet to buy SH4 I'm sure I wouldn't buy it if they don't do at least a 1.3. In Ubi's shortsighted way at earning an extra buck it seems they don't get that some of us havn't bought and thus Ubi has to earn at least another 50 extra bucks to make up for the extra buck they tried to get by releasing SH4 early. As an ex-advertising writer I witnessed companies fizz out because of thinking like this.
|