SUBSIM Radio Room Forums - View Single Post

Catfish · 07-03-21, 05:04 PM

No time to read this all now, will do this tomorrow.

Lobbies should be forbidden, disposed off, some individuals of those organisations deserve to be shot, or worse. We have quite a lot of those in Germany.

Just a thought. imho the EU is the only international organisation that gives at least one or two thoughts about animals and species-concerned transportation and 'humane' killing of animals, which is the reason why this individual Dan Jørgensen(?) tried to convince them. The EU.

The fact that the EU is being undercut by lobby organisations means that it has not the power to stop this. You and the right wing would say they are bribed, and so on, and yaddayadda. The system is obviously not perfect.
But is this the fault of the EU, or should it be set into a state and power of law, able to fight those lobbies?
If, if there would be even one proposal of this kind, to 'arm' the EU in a way to really be able to fight this, every nationalist organisation plus the international ones would virtually "explode", and try to destroy the EU.
Which is what is just now happening.

So i take it you demand a better system (and imho rightly so), where do we begin?
Destroy the EU? Improve it? Do you think there will be a better organisation if we destroy it, or will it be not a fallback into nationalist interests; and petitions as Dan Jorgenson tried would never even be tried at all?

07-03-21, 05:04 PM	#1351
Catfish Dipped Squirrel Operative Join Date: Sep 2001 Location: ..where the ocean meets the sky Posts: 16,903 Downloads: 38 Uploads: 0	No time to read this all now, will do this tomorrow. Lobbies should be forbidden, disposed off, some individuals of those organisations deserve to be shot, or worse. We have quite a lot of those in Germany. Just a thought. imho the EU is the only international organisation that gives at least one or two thoughts about animals and species-concerned transportation and 'humane' killing of animals, which is the reason why this individual Dan Jørgensen(?) tried to convince them. The EU. The fact that the EU is being undercut by lobby organisations means that it has not the power to stop this. You and the right wing would say they are bribed, and so on, and yaddayadda. The system is obviously not perfect. But is this the fault of the EU, or should it be set into a state and power of law, able to fight those lobbies? If, if there would be even one proposal of this kind, to 'arm' the EU in a way to really be able to fight this, every nationalist organisation plus the international ones would virtually "explode", and try to destroy the EU. Which is what is just now happening. So i take it you demand a better system (and imho rightly so), where do we begin? Destroy the EU? Improve it? Do you think there will be a better organisation if we destroy it, or will it be not a fallback into nationalist interests; and petitions as Dan Jorgenson tried would never even be tried at all? __________________ >^..^<*)))>{ All generalizations are wrong.