Quote:
Originally Posted by Dowly
Bollocks.
|
No, just pointing out the
obvious (that you reject).
And beyond the how-to of processing, and the quality of its entered object, I even do not mention the third factor that needs to be seen here: the processor himself. Mapuc reflected a bit about it.
The eye cant watch itself. Ylou cannot find final truths about the system you are embedded in as long as you are embedded in thats ystem and its context and do not step beyond, and outside of it.
You can scan as many newspapers of different kinds as you want - your choice already influence the scanning result, the included claims in their articles - and the not included info/claim/statement in their articles as well! - decide the range of possible conclusions/results of your "critical thinking".
And if your only information sources are forged informaiton, propaganda, then you can think as hard as you want, you nevertheless do not get the real picture of the world and its events.
"
A newspaper is a device for making the ignorant more ignorant, and the crazy crazier." - H.L. Mencken.