Quote:
Originally Posted by Catfish
Let us please put things in perspective.
|
Quote:
|
For example, seven e-mail chains concern matters that were classified at the Top Secret/Special Access Program level when they were sent and received. These chains involved Secretary Clinton both sending e-mails about those matters and receiving e-mails from others about the same matters. There is evidence to support a conclusion that any reasonable person in Secretary Clinton’s position, or in the position of those government employees with whom she was corresponding about these matters, should have known that an unclassified system was no place for that conversation.
|
Quote:
|
We do assess that hostile actors gained access to the private commercial e-mail accounts of people with whom Secretary Clinton was in regular contact from her personal account. We also assess that Secretary Clinton’s use of a personal e-mail domain was both known by a large number of people and readily apparent. She also used her personal e-mail extensively while outside the United States, including sending and receiving work-related e-mails in the territory of sophisticated adversaries. Given that combination of factors, we assess it is possible that hostile actors gained access to Secretary Clinton’s personal e-mail account.
|
...from the statement by FBI Director James B. Comey on the Investigation of Secretary Hillary Clinton’s Use of a Personal E-Mail System. July 5, 2016.
https://www.fbi.gov/news/pressrel/pr...-e-mail-system
So here we have a person who has been in the US political system most of her adult life. First Lady of Arkansas, First Lady of USA, two time Presidential candidate for Democratic Party, US Senator for State of NY, and Secratary of State in Obama administration. To pretend that having a private, unsecured email server for convieniece is ok and to pretend not to know about security classifications is not honest. Call it what you like.
Having a private email server means her emails are not subjected to Freedom of Information Act scrutiny. Can you guess why?