The following is in response to the request of closing some of his own threads by Makman94 recently with out any appearant reason.
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=157376
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=161588
In this post in the thread (just one day old!) of the last link Makman94 makes his request public and to a moderator(Hitman):
http://www.subsim.com/radioroom/show...87&postcount=4
I've noticed this request similarly on many other forums aswel. Once a subject matter is 'closed' (answered to satisfaction) the topic starter requests it to be closed. I wish to start a open a discussion with the question "Why?".
Most often it is (or so it seems) that the thread starter decided he had enough with the subject and wanted to move on. Doesn't want to spend more braincells to thinking about it. ... Fair enough, there is a time and ending to every thing. But I cannot understand why this desicion has to force
everyone to stop posting in that thread. If the thread owner never ever again shows up then that would be a pity to the regular attending crew. But his pressence is not a requirement to keep the discussion/topic alive.
If the thread is closed then the subject spawns up every now and then when a new member wants to know more about this specific thing because he once heard or has seen some of it. And now wants to know more. This creates alot more work for the search function to work through, as each mention of the mod/whatever name needs to be analysed. It also is kind of depressing seeing all those short threads with essentially nothing more than a short description by older members and maybe a link to the original. Sure, new members never heard about a search function, so most of this paragraph I wrote is moot. But wouldn't it be better to keep the discussion in the thread where it all started?
Moderators: Please keep a more reserved stance in the future when a thread-owner requests to close his threads. Keep it open for continuation. Only close it if it has started to smell of awfull things or disrupts the peace.
[steps down from the soapbox]