A legend-Lockheed F-104 Starfighter
 

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fChqJY9VzTU

Chris

It was a real beauty with an undeservedly bad reputation here in Germany.

A legend with a poor safety record, hence the German Luftwaffe called it the ''Witwenmacher'' the Widowmaker.

Also the aircraft that was the center piece of the lockheed scandals here in Europe with high officials like Prince Bernhard of the Netherlands taking bribes to make sure the F104 is favoured over the Mirage 5 for a purchase contract.

Also known in German service as the 'Flying Coffin' and Canadian service as the 'Lawn Dart' and the 'Aluminium Death Tube'.

Details on accidents involving this aircraft: http://www.i-f-s.nl/f-104-accidents/

I remember from somewhere that it was also known as "The missile with a man in it"

There have been rumors of bribery here in Germany too but nothing could be proven beyond doubt.

Regarding the safety record here in Germany I have to say that a lot of the problems were domestic. Pilots were converted without enough training, there were not enough mechanics for the maintenance so corners were cut and there weren't enough hangars to store the planes in overnight so a lot were parked outside. Once general Steinhoff took over the Luftwaffe he completely reorganized everything regarding the F104 and accident rates dropped sharply but at that time it already had the reputation it still has today.:-?
BTW a former Luftwaffe member told me that the accident rate of the F104 as a fighter bomber was actually lower than that of the F84 which it replaced in that role. Strangely enough almost no one is still talking about the Thunderstreak while the Starfighter is infamous.

I didn't think the F-105 was used in war, but I was wrong

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lockhe...04_Starfighter

welcome aboard Chris K :up:

I've heard about former Luftwaffe aces like Erich Hartman that deemed it unsafe because of poor handling characteristics for a combat aircraft and for navy service it lacked the safety margin of a twin engine design.

also a funny piece of Trivia while Germany lost about 30% of their starfighters in service and Canada almost half of the 235 they had in service the Spanish Airforce lost none :haha: granted they didn't got many iirc about 21 and only used them in good weather conditions and only as a interceptor but still clocking over 17,000 hours of flying without an loss.

The F-104 was an excellent aircraft.
Unfortunately, nobody paid any attention to what this aircraft was actually designed for ... the blame for the crashes is on the politicians and the generals without the spine, who have been abusing both the pilots and the plane. :03:

Yes, I watched an interview with Kelly Johnson a long time ago and when the F-104's safety record was brought up, he made it clear that it was designed as an interceptor and pressing it into roles it was not designed for was the main issue. I occasionally check youtube hoping that interview would be posted there but no luck so far.

Still one of the best looking fighters in my opinion.

Built in 1958 and it still looks like it is from the future. :up:

We had (have?) the same problem with the F-16. Some genius came up with the swell idea of using the F-16 for close ground support. :o

That's when we started scraping F-16s off the test ranges. :down:

:Kaleun_Salute:

Best F-104 documentary ever. :03:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3dDumDN3Y5I