SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   General Topics (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=175)
-   -   Politicians (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=239340)

mapuc 12-06-18 06:17 PM

Politicians
 
Politicians are nothing more than a person like the rest of us, except they have the skill to get other people to put their vote on this politicians

Then there are some politicians who have the skills, to get voters to vote on this politicians again and again…., even thou this politicians have made a fool of his voters again and again….

Just so you know it.

Markus

Jimbuna 12-07-18 06:21 AM

:hmmm:

Skybird 12-07-18 06:51 AM

Its the voters who make fools of themselves, markus. Why do they allow to get bought and bribed and why do they legitimise these crooks to do what they are doing? ;) Its all about voter bribery. But you can only bribe somebody who is corrupt.

STEED 12-07-18 07:51 AM

I know longer vote here in the UK as all I see is a bunch of incompetent useless politician's more interested in feathering their own nests while they strut around like peacocks and to hell with us the voter. In part in the UK its out dated political system that needs radical change like sweeping away the worst kind of politician the career politician. The power is with the people to change it but they rather stick their noses in their smart phones on social media.

For the last 30 odd years it has gone down hill in the UK and will continual going to pot.

August 12-07-18 09:37 AM

I don't have a problem with politicians per se. Everybody politics at some point but the people who make it a career are generally poison to a society.

Sailor Steve 12-07-18 12:13 PM

Someone once said that anyone who wants the job should be automatically disqualified from holding it. Of course that leaves us with nobody to run the country/state/city, but that's kind of what we've had for the last two hundred years or so.

August 12-07-18 12:58 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 2580631)
Someone once said that anyone who wants the job should be automatically disqualified from holding it.


A ridiculous sentiment by itself, as if forcing someone who doesn't want the job would somehow be better idea, but it's made worse by your misquote.

What Gore Vidal actually said was that any American who is prepared to run for President..., not just wants to be President. After all just about everybody has toyed with the idea of being the President at some point if only for a few minutes (takes pull off of beer and says "If I were the President i'd..."). THAT should be a dis-qualifier? Who does it leave?
On the other hand not everybody is arrogant enough to publicly state that they are actually prepared for the job of President. While it still not a dis-qualifier in itself it is a rather bold statement to make and is what I think he was getting at.

vienna 12-07-18 01:59 PM

Well, hey, Trump was arrogant enough...












<O>

Sailor Steve 12-07-18 06:15 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 2580636)
A ridiculous sentiment by itself, as if forcing someone who doesn't want the job would somehow be better idea, but it's made worse by your misquote.

What Gore Vidal actually said was that any American who is prepared to run for President..., not just wants to be President.

Who said anything about Gore Vidal?
Quote:

To summarize the summary: anyone who is capable of getting themselves made President should on no account be allowed to do the job.
-Douglas Adams
Quote:

Those who seek power are not worthy of that power.
-Plato, The Republic
Quote:

After all just about everybody has toyed with the idea of being the President at some point if only for a few minutes (takes pull off of beer and says "If I were the President i'd..."). THAT should be a dis-qualifier? Who does it leave?
I guess you didn't stop to read my closing statement.

Quote:

On the other hand not everybody is arrogant enough to publicly state that they are actually prepared for the job of President. While it still not a dis-qualifier in itself it is a rather bold statement to make and is what I think he was getting at.
I guess you also failed to recognize a little spot of humor.

August 12-07-18 06:55 PM

I see you're up to your old tricks Steve. Let me reply in kind.



Quote:

Originally Posted by Sailor Steve (Post 2580699)
Who


Who?



Quote:

said


Is "said" really accurate, given that we are "discussing" something that you "wrote"? :hmmm:



Quote:

anything about


Anything? Well not "anything", just that thing really. :yep:



Quote:

Gore Vidal?

Yeah, you know the Okie dem that you were channeling. Mad google search skillz though...



Oh hell, playing your silly pick apart game is well, silly.



Quote:

I guess you didn't stop to read my closing statement.

...
I guess you also failed to recognize a little spot of humor.

And I guess that you failed to recognize that I was talking about the concept behind the cliche and not about you. But of course when your intention is to irritate then you can't miss any chance to be snarky about it, or do I fail to recognize your intent here?

mapuc 12-07-18 07:12 PM

From the experience I have made throughout the decades is that:

A Voter don't want to take responsibility for the action he or she make/take/do at the voting station-He or she don't want to feel this burden on their shoulder.

They will however have the right to complain.

My Danish and Swedish friend do complain a lot and sometime I say to them

Don't forget a politician wouldn't be where they are if it wasn't for people having put they vote on them.

So in the end we can only blame our self for this situation Sweden and Denmark are in.

I myself haven't been voting since 2006, I came to conclusion that I couldn't blame others for the voting I have done since 1983.

That how I see it.

Markus

Mr Quatro 12-07-18 08:09 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 2580704)
I see you're up to your old tricks Steve. Let me reply in kind.

Who?

Is "said" really accurate, given that we are "discussing" something that you "wrote"? :hmmm:

Anything? Well not "anything", just that thing really. :yep:

Yeah, you know the Okie dem that you were channeling. Mad google search skillz though...

Oh hell, playing your silly pick apart game is well, silly.

And I guess that you failed to recognize that I was talking about the concept behind the cliche and not about you. But of course when your intention is to irritate then you can't miss any chance to be snarky about it, or do I fail to recognize your intent here?

Chill man :D I hear pot is legal in Massachusetts now :yep:

As for the OP's query about politicians ...

One word they are just "lawmakers"

Buddahaid 12-07-18 08:41 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by August (Post 2580704)
I see you're up to your old tricks Steve. And I guess that you failed to recognize that I was talking about the concept behind the cliche and not about you. But of course when your intention is to irritate then you can't miss any chance to be snarky about it, or do I fail to recognize your intent here?

August, sometimes I just don't see where you get these ideas. Steve showed that he wasn't channeling that Okie dem you are fixated on but you have your blinders on again. In a way you are just like Trump at times.

Peace and BB's

August 12-07-18 08:59 PM

Yeah yeah believe what you want.

Skybird 12-07-18 09:01 PM

Ein Satz mit X, August: das war wohl nix.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:10 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.