SUBSIM Radio Room Forums

SUBSIM Radio Room Forums (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/index.php)
-   Silent Hunter 4: Wolves of the Pacific (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/forumdisplay.php?f=202)
-   -   Very Important - Vote For 1.3!!! (https://www.subsim.com/radioroom/showthread.php?t=114873)

ustahl 05-18-07 04:29 PM

My "yes" was No. 189.

We need mooore!:yep:

V.C. Sniper 05-18-07 04:33 PM

I sunk the yes ship with one torpedo.

I also sunk the German yes ship with one torpedo.

Konovalov 05-18-07 04:51 PM

Just voted. Poll results are at 99% for pathc 1.3. No surpirse there. :88)

Lornyk5 05-18-07 05:02 PM

Voted and left my 2 cents, since i'm Canadian I guess that's a cent and 1/2. :lol:

Stuntie 05-18-07 05:21 PM

Voted yup.

Ping Jockey 05-18-07 06:27 PM

Yup I voted yes. We need patch 1.3 soon!!!!!:up::up:

Capt. Shark Bait 05-18-07 07:06 PM

yeah, i went for it, but i gotta wonder who the morons were that voted no:nope:

Elder-Pirate 05-18-07 07:18 PM

Been there,done that. :up:
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y11...an/drinks1.gif

Kingcobra24 05-18-07 08:05 PM

It's pretty bad when you guys pay through the nose for a game, most end up getting only half the materials promised, and the bulk of you end up with a game that crashes more often than a habitual drunken driver! You contact them about the missing materials and they expect you to send even more money to them to receive the things you should have gotten in the first place.
Now, to add insult to injury, Ubi-scoff expects you to beg for the third patch (1.3), so therefore, it's pretty reasonable to assume that it will be the last patch, since they're expecting you to beg for it, and the modders are putting out more add-ons and corrections than Ubi-scoff has put out to date. As long as the private sector is willing to correct Ubi-scoff's mistakes, why should they care or desire to put out patches to correct THEIR screw-ups. Needless to say, *I* won't be buying SH4...I'm happily satisfied with SH1, SH2 and SH3.
:lurk:

Weather-guesser 05-18-07 08:53 PM

1.3 vote
 
Done! :up:

StandingCow 05-18-07 09:55 PM

Voted. :up:

Joe S 05-18-07 10:45 PM

The very idea that they are DEBATING whether or not to create a patch is a very bad sign. Not only did they sell us a half finished product, but now we have to beg them to finish it. If they cant figure out that a patch is needed then nothing we can say will change their mind. After all, they already have what they need, the money from the games we bought and a lot of reviews that fawn over the graphics and whitewash the defects. I will vote for it but we are all suckers for playing along with their little game. Joe S

SurfnSea 05-18-07 10:47 PM

I'm missing something here. Who in their right mind would say no to a patch that would make a product, Ubi messed up, better? Why would Ubi even bother to wonder about such an obvious answer? Then again it makes sense when you consider the condition of SH4 that Ubi shoved out of the nest early.

Even though I have yet to buy SH4 I'm sure I wouldn't buy it if they don't do at least a 1.3. In Ubi's shortsighted way at earning an extra buck it seems they don't get that some of us havn't bought and thus Ubi has to earn at least another 50 extra bucks to make up for the extra buck they tried to get by releasing SH4 early. As an ex-advertising writer I witnessed companies fizz out because of thinking like this.

dwright44 05-19-07 12:54 AM

I voted twice, here and with my money on the next UBI game, I am not getting the new flight sim just out until SHIV is fixed

vasmann 05-19-07 03:51 AM

Done


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:42 AM.

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.11
Copyright ©2000 - 2024, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright © 1995- 2024 Subsim®
"Subsim" is a registered trademark, all rights reserved.